Ethical review is required for all proposed human research activities undertaken in association with Swinburne.  An assessment confirming the proposal adheres to the requirements of the National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2025) and is ethically acceptable must be made prior to commencing the research and before any full funding for the proposal is released.

When is approval needed?

All Swinburne staff and students (including undergraduate and postgraduate students) who intend to conduct research involving human participants and/or their data or tissue must apply for approval from the appropriate Swinburne human research ethics committee prior to commencing their research.

'Human research' has a broad definition that includes:

  • humans taking part in surveys, interviews or focus groups
  • humans undergoing psychological, physiological or medical testing or treatment
  • humans being observed by researchers
  • researchers having access to participants’ personal documents or other materials
  • the collection and use of participants’ body organs, tissues or fluids (such as skin, blood, urine, saliva, hair, bones, tumours and other biopsy specimens, or exhaled breath)
  • accessing participants’ information (in individually identifiable, re-identifiable or non-identifiable form) as part of an existing published or unpublished source or database
  • accessing health information, personal information, and sensitive information for research purposes.
     

Research exempt from ethical review

As stated in NS 5.1.17, research that may be eligible for exemption from ethics review includes research that carries a lower risk to participants or the community and satisfies one or more of the conditions in (a)–(d), below:

(a) the research involves the use of collections (sets) of information or data from which all personal identifiers have been removed prior to being received by the researchers and where researchers explicitly agree

(i) not to attempt to re-identify those with whom the information or data is associated;

(ii) to take all reasonable steps to prevent re-identification of the information or data for unauthorised purposes or access to the information or data by those who are not authorised; and

(iii) that any sharing of any research data during or after the project will not create any additional risks of re-identification of the information or data;

(b) the research is restricted to surveys and observation of public behaviour using information that was or will be collected and recorded without personal identifiers and is highly unlikely to cause distress to anyone associated with the information or the outcomes of the research;

(c) is conducted as part of an educational training program in which the research activity is for training purposes only and where any outcomes or documentation are for program use only;

(d) the research uses only information that is publicly available through a mechanism set out by legislation or regulation and that is protected by law, such as mandatory reporting information, information obtained from registries of births and deaths, coronial investigations or reports of the Australian Bureau of Statistics.

How to apply for an exemption

Applications for an ethics exemption are submitted by the Chief Investigator via Swinburne’s online ethics application and review portal, ERM (Ethics Review Manager).  Please select ‘New Ethics Exemption Application Form’ from the pull-down menu and complete the form online.  Further information regarding ERM is available here.

Why does exempt research require a formal application?

Institutions or other granting bodies must keep a record of any decision to grant exemption from ethics review [NS 5.1.18].  ERM therefore maintains the repository of applications that have been submitted by Swinburne Researchers and assessed as fulfilling the requirements for an exemption to be granted.

Review process for exemption requests

Ethics exemption requests will be reviewed as they are submitted, ie. there are no specific submission deadlines.  Applicants will typically receive the review outcome within 5 working days.  If an exemption application is not approved, a standard human research ethics application must be submitted for SUHREC/SHESC approval before the research can commence.

Further information

If you have any questions regarding the ethics exemption form or process, please contact the Research Ethics Office via email on resethics@swin.edu.au

Educational and training exercises that are being conducted at Swinburne do not usually require review. This is because taught units are not undertaking research activity (i.e. are not answering a specific research question, aim or hypothesis) but are teaching students how to employ different research methods. 

Examples include:

  • undergraduate projects with an education, training or practical experience or placement
  • undergraduate or postgraduate student (e.g. Honours) coursework, assignments and essays
  • non-intervention activity in established educational settings that do not constitute a deviation from normal education practices
  • research on the effectiveness of current instructional techniques, curricula or classroom management that don’t constitute a deviation from normal education practices
  • education, training and practical classes among students, which do not involve students learning through testing procedures on one another
  • evaluation surveys of university staff and students, including student evaluation of teaching.
     

A helpful way to consider whether your education and training activity requires ethical review or not is to consider the intent of the activity:

  1. Are you undertaking the activity only to demonstrate and teach a research method such as surveys, interviews or focus groups and analysis?
  2. Are you conducting the activity to generate data or information to answer a specific research question (in addition to the teaching aspect)?
  3. Does the activity involve vulnerable groups or controversial topics?
     

If you are undertaking the activity to only provide education and training on research methods and the activity does not involve vulnerable groups or controversial topics, then you most likely won’t require an ethics review. If you are unsure, please contact the Research Ethics, Integrity and Biosafety office on resethics@swinburne.edu.au. 

Regardless of whether your activity falls within the definition of research or not, you should always ensure you conduct the activity ethically, with integrity and in accordance with Swinburne's People, Culture and Integrity Policy and the Swinburne Research Conduct Guidelines. 

Many professional practices also have their own code of ethics:

Quality assurance/evaluation projects that do not involve access to or collection of private, sensitive or health data may not require review.

Quality assurance and evaluation activity can be one of these types:

  • very low-risk activity, usually involving the collection and analysis of data generated coincidentally out of current practices or current standard operating procedures and/or protocols
  • data being collected and analysed expressly for the purpose of maintaining standards or identifying areas for improvement in the environment from which the data was obtained.
     

Find out more information from the National Health and Medical Research Council guidelines.

Ethical approval and publishing

Many peer-reviewed journals require evidence of ethics approval prior to submission of manuscripts for publication. The Graduate Studies Office may also want to see evidence of relevant ethics approval when it comes to submitting your thesis for your Honours, Masters or PhD thesis. 

Swinburne's human research ethics committees cannot retrospectively grant ethics approval so please ensure you have checked whether you require ethics approval before conducting your research activity. 

The Ethics Requirements for Research Publication guide can also provide further information.

Levels of ethical review 

Ethics clearance for Swinburne human research proposals is obtained from one of the following ethical review processes, depending on risk, impact or other criteria.

Swinburne's Human Research Ethics Committee (SUHREC) review:

  • Research that poses more than low risk (to participants or others involved in the research)
  • Research that requires a consent waiver for the use of personal information in medical research or personal health information
  • Research involving highly sensitive topics or specified issues or contexts
  • Research intended to study or expose illegal activity
  • Research involving young people with developing maturity where obtaining parental or guardian consent is not possible
  • Research that involves active concealment or planned deception (excluding minor deception in REP surveys)
  • Research conducted during or immediately following natural disasters, public health emergencies, public unrest, armed conflict or other crises.
     

A SUHREC sub-committee (SHESC) reviews lower risk research. The National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research (2025) defines low risk research as research in which there is no risk of harm, but in which there is a risk of discomfort and in which there may also be a foreseeable burden (low-risk research) OR research in which there is no risk of harm or discomfort, but which includes a potential for minor burden or inconvenience (minimal risk research).

(National Statement Chapter 2.1)

Ready to submit an application?

Find out how to apply for human ethics review at Swinburne, including the deadlines for submission and where you can get further assistance. 

Find out more