Are all ultra-processed foods bad? New research suggests not

New Swinburne research is challenging the long-held belief that ultra-processed foods are all bad for you.
In summary
- Swinburne research debunks the theory that ultra-processed foods are bad for you.
- While snacks show bad health outcomes, other products contain neutral or potentially beneficial effects.
- Food requires more nuanced answers, the research shows.
New Swinburne research is challenging the long-held belief that ultra-processed foods are all bad for you.
While snacks and soft drinks show consistently bad health outcomes, products like wholegrain fortified cereals and certain dairy products contain neutral or potentially beneficial effects.
Study author Swinburne Discipline Lead of Dietetics Associate Professor Jimmy Louie says the question ‘Are ultra-processed foods bad?’ requires a more nuanced answer than a simple yes or no.
“Headlines make it sound like all ultra-processed foods are bad, but the truth is more complicated. Some can offer real nutritional value and fit comfortably into a healthy diet.
“That kind of oversimplification can mislead the public and distract from the most pressing dietary risks.
Associate Professor Louie explains that the health implications of food depend on the context of their consumption within overall dietary patterns.
“Ultra-processed products often provide cost-effective sources of essential nutrients for economically disadvantaged populations and can contribute to reduced food waste through extended shelf-life capabilities.”
“Not everyone can live on only minimally processed foods. Nutritionally sound processed foods can be a healthy, practical choice.”
The study reviewed the Nova system, which categorises foods into four groups based on their level of processing, from fresh or minimally processed items to ultra-processed products. The widely used system is controversial because of how it defines and labels processed versus ultra-processed foods.
Associate Professor Louie is calling for a system that looks at both processing and nutrition, so people get clearer, fairer guidance.
“While the classification of foods based on processing has made valuable contributions to our understanding of health, it fails to capture important distinctions in nutritional quality, processing methods, and health implications.
“People deserve advice that makes that distinction. The evidence shows we can be smarter about which processed foods we avoid and which we keep.”
-
Media Enquiries
Related articles
-
- Health
World-first study to develop early warning system for bipolar sufferers
A world-first Swinburne project will develop an early warning system for individuals with bipolar disorder.
Monday 08 September 2025 -
- Health
What happens if I eat too much protein?
Analysis for The Conversation by nutrition expert Dr Margaret Murray.
Tuesday 09 September 2025 -
- Health
World-first disease progression model offers new hope for muscular dystrophy patients
Patients with a common type of muscular dystrophy will benefit from a world-first AI powered disease progression model with ‘life-changing’ implications, using advanced MRI imaging at Swinburne University of Technology.
Friday 05 September 2025 -
- Health
94% of older Australians say home gardening space is extremely important, so why isn’t it part of housing crisis discussions?
94 per cent of older Australians say having gardening space where they live is extremely important, according to a new Swinburne report.
Monday 15 September 2025 -
- Technology
World first study of young adults’ brain activity shows TV and gaming boosts focus, while social media hinders it
A world-first Swinburne-led study into young adults’ brain activity has found that TV and gaming are associated with increased focus, while social media is associated with decreased focus.
Thursday 07 August 2025